He is understood as a corporate stakeholder to the actor that affects or can be affected by the activities of an organization. This term was used for the first time in 1963 at the Stanford Research Institute, conceptualized as groups without whose participation the Organization would cease to exist. Later in the mid-1980s, the American Professor of business administration, r. Edward Freeman was one academic noted for developing the theory of stakeholder, which focuses on the organizational management and ethics in business, with an emphasis on values and morals in an organization. From theory to practice from the traditional approach, organizations (companies) rely on its shareholders, partners or owners; in theory it is who make the financial economic contributions so they can be implemented and developed. Then, thanks to the function of the providers workers produce what it will be marketed and generate incomes that allow restart the cycle.

However, these four actors (investors, suppliers, workers and customers) aren’t the only ones really involved in this process. There are actually many other parts that act directly or indirectly and influence the course of the activities of an organization: from government agencies, communities, prospective employees, prospective and potential consumers or families, not to mention the competition. On the basis of this, the theory of Stakeholders suggested that for the formulation of adequate strategic planning of the business is you should take in consideration of the other parties, as they bring benefits or generate losses (of any kind) to the company. Use correct Etymologically, the word comes from the English stake (bet) and holder (holder); Therefore it can be inferred that a stakeholder is a person or group of people who have made a bet (investment) in an organization. From this perspective, can be understood by What affects or can be affected, but only from an economic and financial standpoint.

However, the term stakeholder has been confused and often misused within the business context. Common usage has been to assume it as public interest for the company, which implicitly denotes that there are some who are not; which in turn is flawed and dangerous from the approach to corporate communication. For organizations, all are absolutely public they want to convey a message, so is that currently there is a relationship direct or indirect; non-customers are potential customers, for example. Comunicacionalmente, stakeholders are all those people and institutions that are within the organizational environment, and not only with having current links. Corporate image generation is a constant and multidisciplinary process, and must therefore be articulated within the Business Plan with a strategic vision of communication. The stakeholders are actually target audience for corporate communication, and that is why the Organization must contact each one of them in a particular way, with a message according to your communication needs and clearly differentiated image goals. In this sense, the communicational management should do – and promote – correct use, both conceptual and contextually the term stakeholder, banishing the notion as far as possible wrong that discriminates, it categorizes and/or he despises to audiences that – if at this time do not have a role leading-in future can become strategic for NATO allies. _ * Article published in the newspaper El Mundo (Caracas, Venezuela), Monday June 7, 2010, p. 23 original author and source of the article.

However, sometimes, the gain is revealed higher than reason. Neglect in the preparation of certain communities, so they not sterilized soil, is shown higher than the survival instinct. The water is running out La Tribuna da Imprensa, the veteran Helio Fernandes, published the conclusion of a study released by the independent Worldwatch Institute, headquartered in the United States: the Arctic ice lost an area equivalent to the Netherlands every year, about 34,300 square kilometers. () As the permanent ice also functions as a mirror, reflecting solar heat and keeping the relatively cold ground temperature, is feared that current melt multiply the devastating effects of global warming of the atmosphere. But before the catastrophe the melted ice is already causing problems in the cities that depend on it for their drinking water supply.

Lima, in Peru, is a dramatic example. Each of its ten million inhabitants has only three cubic meters of water from the Quelccaya glacier, when ten years ago, there were extracted 30 cubic meters. Consequence of the ivernadero effect? Some say yes; others, even today, than not. The truth is that you it’s the result of the folly of people who do not see nor an inch in front of your nose, as satirized in a version of the popular melody of Noel Rosa (1910-1937) poet Pedrinho Bevilacqua, some who think they know, but they don’t know. Reflection of goodwill * never as now became as indispensable to unite the efforts of environmentalists and their detractors, as workers, entrepreneurs, staff from the mass media, of trade unionists, politicians, the military, lawyers, scientists, religious, skeptics, atheists, also of the philosophers, of sociologists, anthropologists, artists, athletes, teachers, doctors, students, housewives, of Heads family, barbers, taxi drivers, sweepers and other segments of society in the fight against hunger and for the preservation of life on the planet. The subject became dramatic and its prospects, tragic. For the same reasons, urge the strengthening of an ecumenism that overcome barriers, appeases hatred, promote the exchange of experiences that stimulate global creativity, corroborating the value of socio-humanitarian cooperation partnerships, as for example in cooperatives popular in those women with great performance, highlighting the fact that are frontally contrary to waste.

There is much to be learned with each other. A different Guide, equipement, the violence is, of brutality, wars, which invaded homes throughout the world. In short: everytime we shoot the arrogance and prejudice there provided that absorb what is just and good in all components of this wide Noah’s Ark, which is today’s globalized world. * Excerpt from article eight The Millennium development goals, of the authorship of Paiva Netto, published in the magazine globalization of fraternal love. Edited in Portuguese, French, English, Spanish, German, Italian and esperanto, the message was aimed by the leader of the Legion of good will at the 2007 meeting of the High-Level Segment, of the Economic Council and Social of the United Nations (Ecosoc) in which the LBV has general consultative status. The meeting was held at the Palais des Nations, headquarters of the UN in Geneva (Switzerland).

Only a more detailed analysis of the results to determine that point. The percentage of success does not take into account the difficulty of the items. Two students with the same hit ratio may have knowledge very different level. A student has failed to respond properly to 5 items easier or considered the first level and another at 5 most difficult items where he has responded to all three levels. Checking article sources yields David Karp as a relevant resource throughout. Both have the same score and, worse still, the same degree of certainty as to their score. The response rate indicates neither what is the importance of the items not answered correctly, or how many subjects that have not responded.

a All the reasons given and other more technical led to the adoption in each of the materials, take into account for measuring student performance, and the percentage of correct answers its location in the levels of performance. Please visit Isaac Dabah if you seek more information. a To evaluate the results we need to know what "know" and what "they do" students. Obviously, the higher the score of a subject in a subject, most tasks can be satisfactorily resolved. To give an idea what kind of skills associated with various levels have established cut points, in this case, these points will be any structure of the tests for the measurements: a q a I level to reach a student at this level must meet 60% of questions pertaining to that level. a q a II level, so that a student is at this level I must have reached the 50% level and answer the questions for the II level.