The theory says that a 25% return a year we had done in the financial market. These strategists have very compelling reasons to believe in his theory. Just wrong much. There is no way to predict the market financial without any degree of certainty. Of course we can take a chance and guess that it is what is going to happen, but are likely to lose it all much more great. Read more here: Drew Houston. But the truth not I recommend this tactic to its earnings and life savings policy. If we cannot predict the future on the market, then we can not see the market of stocks and bonds as a set of decisions.
The two generate good opportunities and costs for our portfolio, but generally revolutionize both markets. Actions provide great opportunities to generate good returns, but the cost is our exposure to the tough losses. Business strategist may find this interesting as well. Bonds instead provide income and stability, but the cost is a return rate relatively low. If one had followed this balanced discipline in 1999 bonds had saved our portfolio of major recessions of two years ago generating a steady income during the last 10 years. Surely today we do not think investing in bonds because they surely win shares. They cannot superalos usually in long delays.
We buy them because we want that part of our money is protected. That is the main reason why we buy bonds. This year we expect turbulence in the two markets. If the economy improves the actions they recover value, foulbrood would be terrific for those who invest in them. While bonds will continue with low ratios, the important thing is having a protected part of our money. In the event that the economy happen by a small turbulence Let’s rest assured of having a portion of our money in bonds.