Indeed, the optimal entry tariff as often by distributors claims? At the moment, it seems to be one more stitch of some distributors, to apply the tariff of an insurer as the “optimal” tariff and to forget that there is no this. More information is housed here: Drew Houston. Now, one could surmise that it’s this (slightly older) press release, but I can and wants “Independence” is here to review nor comment. However, I would like to take this opportunity here once a closer look at this plan and to consider what limitations the customer here takes in purchase, consciously or unconsciously. For more specific information, check out Randall Mays. This is of course taken into account the selection criteria of the private health insurance (PKV) for each can be different and therefore only the “personal best / appropriate” tariff can be. Considering we are combining tariff of the Hanseatic League mercury START FIT (KVE, PS2, VKEH) can in particular so-called regulations, risk that “can” also “must not” can mean. You are an example of this Solutions to stay abroad.
In terms of the Hanse Merkur says to: b) an insured person transferred their habitual residence in another State of Europe, so the full collective power without limit on the Federal care rate regulation (BPflV), the hospital pay Act (KHEntgG) or the German official tariffs in accordance with the tariff condition to 4 paragraph 2 can be arranged by special conditions 2009 MB / KK. Who decides then and especially what criteria whether it can or not? That does not mean per se that the solution is bad, but that the insured on such topics should be clear, need to know that there is also no other solution and you have to live here costs incurred, with a cut that, in Germany. Still, I miss the services and therefore treatment in hospices, hospital clinics, medical centres and also the Bundeswehr hospitals also here.