As if there were few courts to contradict, now Strasbourg valid marriage by the rite Gypsy of Maria Luisa Munoz. I have nothing against the woman, who surely loved your partner much more than others with all kinds of roles in rule. I am concerned about, however, the gradual equalization of situations in fact to the right, which will eventually emptied of content to any contract. Because, what acquiring legal obligations if they will get the same rights without making it? Brought the case to the end, any wedding ceremony would be valid, since the Mormon rites until the Church of Tom Cruise and John Travolta. Even what sign in court Catholic marriage of the spouses belief that be? By extension, the legal formalization of any contractual relationship, we could save us from the sale of property until the mortgage loans. You imagine the amount of time and money we would save in? notaries, paperwork, public and other records? Difficult, of course, would demarcate what relationships are real and what fictitious, where the truth lies, and where lies the lie. For that reason, precisely, contracts were created. Maybe, the blame for all this mess is in the same institution of marriage, which is undergoing its most low hours. For that reason, perhaps would have to suppress it. Total, if it gives the same marriage that do not do so, if only a sigh last couple relationships and if its rupture involves many times unpleasant messes, what follow with an institution as problematic?